*Author’s note: I intended to post this article three months ago. Other developments delayed the release. Thanks in advance for pardoning the untimeliness.*

Critics are raving about it. Barak Obama gave a speech about it. It’s propelled two books onto bestseller lists. Committees have showered more awards on it than clouds have showered rain on California this past decade.

What is it? The* *Hamiltonian, represented by . It’s an operator (a mathematical object) that basically represents a system’s energy. Hamiltonians characterize systems classical and quantum, from a brick in a Broadway theater to the photons that form a spotlight. determines how a system evolves, or changes in time.

I lied: Obama didn’t give a speech about the Hamiltonian. He gave a speech about *Hamilton. Hamilton: An American Musical* spotlights 18th-century revolutionary Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton conceived the United States’s national bank. He nurtured the economy as our first Secretary of the Treasury. The year after Alexander Hamilton died, William Rowan Hamilton was born. Rowan Hamilton conceived four-dimensional numbers called *quaternions*. He nurtured the style of physics, *Hamiltonian mechanics*, used to model quantum systems today.

*Hamilton* has enchanted audiences and critics. Ticket sell out despite costing over $1,000. Tonys, Grammys, and Pulitzers have piled up. Lawmakers, one newspaper reported, ridicule colleagues who haven’t seen the show. One political staff member confessed that “dodging ‘Hamilton’ barbs has affected her work—so much so that she hasn’t returned certain phone calls ‘because I couldn’t handle the anxiety’ of being harangued for her continued failure to see the show.”

Musical-theater fans across the country are applauding Alexander. Hamilton forbid that William Rowan should envy him. Let’s celebrate Hamiltonians.

I’ve been pondering the Hamiltonian

It describes a chain of sites. ranges from 10 to 30 in most computer simulations. The cast consists of quantum particles. Each site houses one particle or none. represents the number of particles at site . represents the removal of a particle from site , and represents the adding of a particle.

The last term in represents the repulsion between particles that border each other. The “nn” in “” stands for “nearest-neighbor.” The term encodes particles’ hopping between sites. means, “A particle jumps from site to site .”

The first term in , we call *disorder*. Imagine a landscape of random dips and hills. Imagine, for instance, crouching on the dirt and snow in Valley Forge. Boots and hooves have scuffed the ground. Zoom in; crouch lower. Imagine transplanting the row of sites into this landscape. denotes the height of site .

Say that the dips sink low and the hills rise high. The disorder traps particles like soldiers behind enemy lines. Particles have trouble hopping. We call this system *many-body localized*.

Imagine flattening the landscape abruptly, as by stamping on the snow. This flattening triggers a *phase transition*. Phase transitions are drastic changes, as from colony to country. The flattening frees particles to hop from site to site. The particles spread out, in accordance with the Hamiltonian’s term. The particles come to obey *thermodynamics*, a branch of physics that I’ve effused about.

The Hamiltonian encodes repulsion, hopping, localization, thermalization, and more behaviors. A richer biography you’ll not find amongst the Founding Fathers.

As Hamiltonians constrain particles, politics constrain humans. A play has primed politicians to smile upon the name “Hamilton.” Physicists study Hamiltonians and petition politicians for funding. Would politicians fund us more if we emphasized the Hamiltonians in our science?

Gold star for whoever composes the most rousing lyrics about many-body localization. Or, rather, fifty white stars.

The quaternionic number system has far more jewels than most people know. Quaternionic number systems exist in many versions that differ in their ordering. Ordering can occur by applying Cartesian coordinate systems and subsequently by a polar coordinate system. Quaternionic Hilbert spaces exist and they can harbor multiple quaternionic number systems. Operators can use these number spaces or the target spaces of quaternionic functions as eigenspaces. See: A simple model by Hans van Leunen https://doc.co/yvg1Bv

The existence of versions of quaternionic number systems is responsible for the existence of electric charges and color charges.

You probably saw this, but in case you didn’t or your readers would be interested …

I had not seen this video. Thanks for the link, Pete!

Nice post ! Can you recommend me some papers or material about MBL? Thanks a lot!

Thanks for your interest, Carlos. This blog post provides a gentle introduction: https://quantumfrontiers.com/2016/03/13/march-madness-and-quantum-memory/. A review appears here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.0686. (And we hope to post our paper soon!)

Pingback: It’s CHAOS! | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: The sign problem(s) | Quantum Frontiers

I’m disappointed. I thought you were going to write the play. I sort of figured Caltech would be the place to present a Hamiltonian musical.

Pingback: 3D neutrinos on your phone, Hamiltonian: an Irish Musical, is a March for Science a good idea? – Physics World

Pingback: The Ground Space of Babel | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: Rock-paper-scissors, granite-clock-idea | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: Catching up with the quantum-thermo crowd | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: I get knocked down… | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: What distinguishes quantum thermodynamics from quantum statistical mechanics? | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: The quantum steampunker by Massachusetts Bay | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: Quantum steampunk invades Scientific American | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: Up we go! or From abstract theory to experimental proposal | Quantum Frontiers

Pingback: A quantum walk down memory lane | Quantum Frontiers